About Me

Name: Richard Barrett
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

The Coming Unrest In The Dis-United States of America

by
Richard L. Barrett, III

We are on the precipice of another revolutionary upheaval in America. Forty years ago, the United States found itself involved in a conflict it didn’t really want to fight in Viet Nam. The evening news bombarded Americans at the dinner table with televised footage of our embattled young men being bloodied and battered by the enemy. The daily ritual of showing our young men coming home in coffins at an ever increasingly alarming rate as the 1960’s wore on became too much for Americans, thus Viet Nam created a new movement in America that decried bloodshed, for any reason, and declared that making love and not war was the answer.

Lost in the television and print media, who took their cue from TV, coverage was the fact that in Viet Nam, the United States never lost a major battle. I’m sure this is news for some reading this column because, ever since the fall of Saigon to the communist North Vietnamese, the media has portrayed Viet Nam as an American defeat, which is absolutely not true. But nor was it a victory either. For America, the war in Viet Nam officially ended in 1973 when we signed a cease-fire truce with North Vietnam.

Less than two years later, when the North Vietnamese broke the truce and invaded South Vietnam, the United States Government, reeling from a weakened presidency in the aftermath of Watergate and controlled by a Democratic Congress that was war weary, refused to fund the South Vietnamese Government in order to defend themselves from the communist siege. Viet Nam became a united communist country in 1975.

Forty years later, once more America is fighting a war it doesn’t want to fight and once again, Americans are being bombarded with news footage of our soldiers bloodied and battered and of the turmoil and unrest in a foreign country that Americans have decided is irrelevant to them. Once more, despite the fact that there is no possible way for the insurgent terrorist armies to militarily defeat the armed forces of the United States, the enemy insurgents are relying on Western media to disunite America, as they did with their Viet Nam reporting, in order to defeat our military. Like his predecessor, Lyndon B. Johnson, George Bush’s presidency is becoming increasingly obsolete. Once more, emboldened activists for “peace” are heralding the trumpet of retreat for U.S. soldiers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And as the activists become louder and garner more attention and support from Americans though the media, the beginnings of a revolution storm is brewing. The war in Iraq is taking its toll on America by distracting the president, his cabinet members, as well as the Congress from pressing issues that demand attention now, whether it is the unmitigated influx of third world illegal immigration or the development of nuclear weapons in North Korea and Iran, countries with unstable and dangerous leadership.

It is now too late and the die has been cast. After this Fall’s congressional and state elections, and regardless of who controls the Congress, the next five years in America will be one of upheaval, disunity and chaos. The 2008 presidential election will be the most fiercely fought election since 1968. It will be coarse and brutal, spilling out into the streets as various groups, who no longer view themselves as Americans first, will finally feel secure in their numbers and change the direction of the country much as the activists of forty years ago did.

The force of the coming implosion will only be mitigated by world events outside of our realm. Those coming events will hurt American citizenry and once more force us to look within ourselves, just as our forefathers have done, for the fortitude and strength needed to sustain our fragile democracy. That the answer is not one of certainty, because our forefathers have either been forgotten or are not respected and even despised by some groups who will never consider themselves to be Americans first, is a frightening prospect to those citizens who call America home.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Harry Reid Gets Tough...Against the President?

Harry Reid, Protector of the American People Democratic Party

by
Richard L. barrett, III

When it comes to national security, an issue the Democrats are hoping to make a case to the American people in this Fall's general elections that they, and not the Republicans, will be the responsible party in fighting terrorism if elected to the majority, have proven once more that they are more interested in attaining a majority Congress than being patriots in the War on Terror.

Upon the breaking news this past Thursday that a major Islamic terrorist plot to blow up passenger planes flying out of England to America had been foiled, Democrat senate minority leader Harry Reid of Nevada rushed out to release the following statement, "As a result of mismanagement and the wrong funding priorities, we are not as safe as we should be...The Iraq war has diverted our focus and more than $300 billion in resources from the war on terrorism and has created a rallying cry for international terrorists. This latest plot demonstrates the need for the Bush administration and the Congress to change course in Iraq and ensure that we are taking all the steps necessary to protect Americans at home and across the world." (
http://reid.senate.gov/)

There are two problems with Mr. Reid's rushed statement, his obvious attempt to "get ahead" of the story to show the voters that the Democrats are the real vigilant anti-terror party. The first is that, well, the terror plot failed. So unless Mr. Reid is criticizing President Bush's lack of ESP in discovering terrorists even before they begin planning their vicious mayhem, I'm not sure what he is upset about.

Secondly, yesterday, it was revealed that American intelligence played a major role in intercepting the "terrorist chatter" among the Muslim plotters. The AP reported that, "a U.S. congressman briefed by intelligence officials, who did not want to be identified because of the sensitivity of the investigation, said U.S. intelligence had intercepted terrorist chatter." Time magazine online also reports, "MI5 and Scotland Yard agents tracked the plotters from the ground, while a knowledgeable American official says U.S. intelligence provided London authorities with intercepts of the group's communications."

Contrary to Mr. Reid's attempt to disparage the commander-in-chief and his administration with his thoughtless and highly partisan statement, this President is keeping America as safe as it should be. There are many wrong-headed points Mr. Reid makes in his statement that reeks of partisanship over patriotism. One is that the war in Iraq has created a rallying cry for international terrorists. Hello, McFly! International terrorists have had their sights set on America well before our second incursion into Iraq. From the suicide bombing of our Marines based in Southern Lebanon in 1983 to the 9/11 attacks, Muslim terrorists have targeted Americans for over two decades.

Mr. Reid concludes his preposterous statement by tying the recent foiled bombing plot to Iraq! How this failed attempt to kill thousands of innocents over the Atlantic Ocean is related to changing the course in Iraq to "ensure that we are taking all the steps necessary to protect Americans at home and across the world" is purely and utterly nonsensical.

The party that wants to end the Patriot Act, the party that wants to kill the NSA surveillance tactics, and the party that wants to pull our troops out of Iraq, NOW, and who cries, "Uncle!" when the going gets tough, is the party that will protect Americans here and the world over? Only the French have less fortitude than Democrats, but the French can be excused due to the extravagant and elegant nature of the their country. Who wants to fight wars when you can be dining on French cuisine, fine wines and cheese along the French Riviera?

In the end, Mr. Reid's shortsighted rush to criticize our Commander-in-Chief reveals, with unintended consequences, to the American people that the Democratic Party is not interested in protecting our country. They are, at best, ugly opportunists interested solely in regaining congressional power. At worst, they are undermining the War on Terror and causing a very real risk to the lives of the American people. One can only hope that Mr. Reid's position as the minority leader in the Senate will continue after the votes are tallied for the coming November elections.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »